This piece, contributed by professor emeritus Stan Smith, is a sneak preview of the 2017 issue of Innovation, 性视界传媒's research magazine, and part the "Our Future" series celebrating 性视界传媒's 60th anniversary.
Anniversaries call to mind destinations we鈥檝e reached, and this fall, 性视界传媒 celebrates reaching its 60th year. While we can be proud of all the milestones and successes we鈥檝e achieved together over six decades, I鈥檇 also like to look more closely at the journey that鈥檚 brought us here, as it lights the way toward the next great destination we seek before our 70th.
We are on an excellent trajectory toward joining the ranks of the nation鈥檚 top research universities鈥攚hat you鈥檒l often hear those of us at 性视界传媒 refer to as the Top Tier. I believe we鈥檝e actually been on the path to becoming this type of research university all along, even if we didn鈥檛 have this goal in mind from the start.
One of the most defining characteristics of a top research university is the amount of research funding it generates from external sources each year. In general, top research institutions garner at least $100-120 million in research funding annually.
At about $60 million this year, 性视界传媒 admittedly will need to approximately double its funding to become one of the nation鈥檚 top research universities. But considering 性视界传媒 received between $10-15 million in research funding in the 1990s, we鈥檝e already come a long way.
Research funding was even lower than that when I arrived in 1985. At that time, the biology department had two research 鈥渟tars鈥 who went on to become distinguished professors: animal physiologist Mohamed Yousef, who studied animals鈥 reaction to heat and water stress, including how heat and dehydration could impact Air Force pilots; and biologist/activist Jim Deacon, who was responsible for the Devils Hole pupfish making its way onto the endangered species list. Most of the remaining biology faculty didn鈥檛 conduct funded research. But by the time I was hired, every person we hired was expected to be an active researcher with grant support.
We also didn鈥檛 have dedicated research labs back then, conducting research in our teaching labs instead. This meant that there were times during the school year when I couldn鈥檛 keep my research equipment on the lab benches because my students were using the space to work on their assignments and experiments. However, once dedicated research labs that could house equipment and sustain continuous experiments were carved out across campus, 性视界传媒鈥檚 research productivity really took off. This is how we got from $15 million in research funding in the mid-1990s to around $60 million between 2005 and 2010鈥攁 quadrupling in only 15 years.
Then the recession hit. 性视界传媒鈥檚 funding dropped to $40 million by 2012. However, what is often forgotten about this time period is that about 40 percent of 性视界传媒鈥檚 research funding came from direct congressional appropriations (i.e., earmarks) then; our downturn was directly tied to the elimination of those earmarks in 2012.
Despite this, 性视界传媒 actually saw a steady increase in competitive grant funding through the recession years鈥攙ersus noncompetitive funding such as the aforementioned earmarks, generally delegated without rigorous peer review. In university-ranking circles, competitive grant funding is the primary signifier of excellence. And now that we鈥檙e post-recession, these kinds of annual increases are becoming more pronounced at 性视界传媒.
The Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR), which enhances research capabilities in underfunded states, was a key catalyst in my research career. Large, multiyear grants like this provide important infrastructure in key research focus areas, with the goal of helping interdisciplinary teams sustain the original investment through competitive grants beyond the initial support. After an initial $2 million Department of Energy (DOE) EPSCoR grant that built a free-air CO2 enrichment site at the Nevada Test Site, we were able to acquire another $10 million in competitive grants from the DOE and National Science Foundation over the next decade to continue the long-term experiment.
Obviously, 性视界传媒 needs to continue to leverage EPSCoR and similar programs, and our new School of Medicine will increase our research portfolio eventually, but I believe the real key to becoming a premier research university by 70 is to continue a hybrid approach of spearheading faculty-driven initiatives from our departments and executing on a campuswide, strategic plan in which we identify key focus areas and make targeted, midcareer hires in those areas. Hires like Malcolm Nicol, whom 性视界传媒 recruited from UCLA to form the High Pressure Science and Engineering Center (HiPSEC) 鈥 an interdisciplinary lab that studies nuclear testing, stockpiles, and their alternatives鈥攔esulted in what is now one of the most productive and well-funded centers on campus.
We also need more research space. The Science and Engineering Building dramatically increased 性视界传媒鈥檚 collective ability to do cutting-edge, interdisciplinary research; at least one more building like this is essential to keep us on the up and up.
Where there is a will and a good hybrid strategy, there is a way. And if how far we鈥檝e already come in our journey is any indicator, 性视界传媒 is speeding its way to the top.
Stan Smith has served 性视界传媒 for 32 years and counting 鈥 first as a research-active faculty member in the School of Life Sciences, then as associate vice president for research for 10 years, and next as the acting dean of the College of Sciences before becoming professor emeritus this summer.
